<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>ETH on goodinfo.net Daily</title>
    <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/tags/eth/</link>
    <description>goodinfo.net daily curated global news: AI, tech, finance, and world affairs.</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <author>goodinfo.net</author>
    
    
    
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 16:17:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://goodinfo.net/en/tags/eth/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Arbitrum DAO Approves $70M ETH Release for Kelp DAO Fund Recovery</title>
      <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/arbitrum-dao-70m-kelp-recovery-may-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 16:17:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>goodinfo.net</author>
      <guid>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/arbitrum-dao-70m-kelp-recovery-may-2026/</guid>
      <description>Arbitrum DAO Approves $70M ETH Release for Kelp DAO Recovery Arbitrum DAO has voted to approve the release of approximately $70 million in ETH to recover funds related to the Kelp DAO incident. However, a May 1 court order restricted Arbitrum DAO from moving the recovered funds, prompting Aave to file an emergency application to lift the restrictions.
This marks an increasingly complex interaction between decentralized governance and the judicial system. The Arbitrum community had previously voted to recover funds transferred due to a Kelp DAO bridge vulnerability, but legal uncertainty has stalled the transfer process.
</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="arbitrum-dao-approves-70m-eth-release-for-kelp-dao-recovery">Arbitrum DAO Approves $70M ETH Release for Kelp DAO Recovery</h2>
<p>Arbitrum DAO has voted to approve the release of approximately $70 million in ETH to recover funds related to the Kelp DAO incident. However, a May 1 court order restricted Arbitrum DAO from moving the recovered funds, prompting Aave to file an emergency application to lift the restrictions.</p>
<p>This marks an increasingly complex interaction between decentralized governance and the judicial system. The Arbitrum community had previously voted to recover funds transferred due to a Kelp DAO bridge vulnerability, but legal uncertainty has stalled the transfer process.</p>
<p>Aave&rsquo;s emergency filing highlights the challenges DeFi protocols face when on-chain governance conflicts with off-chain legal frameworks. The court has yet to make a final ruling, and the timeline for fund release remains unclear.</p>
<p>The incident has sparked debate about the boundaries of DAO governance authority. While on-chain community voting expresses clear intent, judicial intervention shows that decentralized organizations still need to consider traditional legal constraints when handling major fund decisions.</p>
<p><strong>Source</strong>: <a href="https://www.theblock.co/">The Block</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category domain="category">crypto</category>
      <category domain="tag">Arbitrum</category><category domain="tag">Kelp DAO</category><category domain="tag">ETH</category><category domain="tag">DeFi</category><category domain="tag">Fund Recovery</category>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
