<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>International Conference on goodinfo.net Daily</title>
    <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/tags/international-conference/</link>
    <description>goodinfo.net daily curated global news: AI, tech, finance, and world affairs.</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <author>goodinfo.net</author>
    
    
    
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 10:38:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://goodinfo.net/en/tags/international-conference/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>[Brief] EU Drops Sponsorship of Disinformation Conference at US Request</title>
      <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/world/brief-eu-drops-disinfo-conference-sponsorship-2026-10-08/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 10:38:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>goodinfo.net</author>
      <guid>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/world/brief-eu-drops-disinfo-conference-sponsorship-2026-10-08/</guid>
      <description>The Guardian and Reuters reported the European Commission withdrew its sponsorship of an academic conference on disinformation and foreign interference at the request of US officials. Canada also announced it was pulling its sponsorship. The conference drew US criticism over panels critical of Washington.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[Core Summary]</strong>
The Guardian and Reuters reported that the European Commission withdrew its sponsorship of an academic conference on disinformation and foreign interference at the request of US officials. Canada also announced it was pulling its sponsorship. The conference drew US criticism over panels critical of Washington.</p>
<p><strong>[Event Details]</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Withdrawal of sponsorship</strong>: The European Commission confirmed it is no longer a sponsor of the research-institution-led international conference on disinformation.</li>
<li><strong>US pressure</strong>: Sources said US officials pressured the EU and Canada to cut ties with the conference, citing agenda items critical of the United States.</li>
<li><strong>Canada follows</strong>: The Canadian government also announced it would no longer sponsor the event, aligning with the EU position.</li>
<li><strong>Conference background</strong>: The conference has long focused on foreign information manipulation, disinformation dissemination and election interference, and is an important platform for European and American academic and policy circles.</li>
<li><strong>Academic reaction</strong>: Some participating scholars and institutions expressed regret at the EU’s withdrawal, saying it could damage transatlantic cooperation on disinformation research.</li>
<li><strong>Follow-up impact</strong>: Within the EU, discussions are under way on how to find a new balance between academic independence and transatlantic relations.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>[Panoramic Analysis]</strong>
The EU’s withdrawal of sponsorship is the latest case of values friction in transatlantic relations. On disinformation, election interference and related issues, Europe and the United States had previously shared research agendas and policy frameworks, but as the US government shifts its attitude toward international mechanisms, the EU is forced to choose between preserving academic independence and preserving the relationship with Washington. In the short term, the move may be read as a European concession to the US, but in the medium and long term it will also push Europe to reflect on its own technological and institutional autonomy in digital governance and media literacy.</p>
<p><strong>[Comparative Perspectives]</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>European Commission</strong>: Confirmed the sponsorship withdrawal but gave no indication of conditions attached to future cooperation.</li>
<li><strong>US side</strong>: Officials reportedly pressed for an end to participation because parts of the agenda criticized the United States; the precise demands require formal-document verification.</li>
<li><strong>Canadian government</strong>: Followed the EU decision, suggesting that institutions in North America and Europe are reassessing cooperation boundaries with US agencies.</li>
<li><strong>Scholars and research institutions</strong>: Some worry that withdrawal will weaken cross-border research, while others argue that academic platforms need stronger conflict-of-interest disclosures.</li>
<li><strong>Observers</strong>: Say the impact may reach beyond this conference by changing how European and American governments fund and govern joint research.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Editor: GoodInfo Global News Team</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category domain="category">world</category>
      <category domain="tag">European Union</category><category domain="tag">United States</category><category domain="tag">Disinformation</category><category domain="tag">International Conference</category><category domain="tag">Canada</category>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
