<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Kelp on goodinfo.net Daily</title>
    <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/tags/kelp/</link>
    <description>goodinfo.net daily curated global news: AI, tech, finance, and world affairs.</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <author>goodinfo.net</author>
    
    
    
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:03:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://goodinfo.net/en/tags/kelp/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Kelp Claims LayerZero Approved Setup Blamed for $292M Drift Bridge Hack</title>
      <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/kelp-layerzero-drift-bridge-hack-blame-may-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:03:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>goodinfo.net</author>
      <guid>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/kelp-layerzero-drift-bridge-hack-blame-may-2026/</guid>
      <description>Kelp DAO claims LayerZero approved the bridge configuration exploited in the $292M Drift hack, shifting blame in the ongoing dispute.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="kelp-points-finger-at-layerzero-in-drift-hack-dispute">Kelp Points Finger at LayerZero in Drift Hack Dispute</h2>
<p>Kelp DAO claims that LayerZero approved the specific bridge configuration that was exploited in the $292 million Drift protocol hack. The DPRK-linked attack remains one of the largest crypto security incidents of 2026.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      
      <category domain="tag">Kelp</category><category domain="tag">LayerZero</category><category domain="tag">Drift</category><category domain="tag">hack</category><category domain="tag">bridge exploit</category>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
