<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>LayerZero on goodinfo.net Daily</title>
    <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/tags/layerzero/</link>
    <description>goodinfo.net daily curated global news: AI, tech, finance, and world affairs.</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <author>goodinfo.net</author>
    
    
    
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 02:12:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://goodinfo.net/en/tags/layerzero/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>[Flash] Lombard Joins LayerZero Exodus, $4B Assets Move to Chainlink Bridge</title>
      <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/lombard-layerzero-chainlink-bridge-migration-may-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 02:12:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>goodinfo.net</author>
      <guid>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/lombard-layerzero-chainlink-bridge-migration-may-2026/</guid>
      <description>[Flash] Lombard Joins LayerZero Exodus, $4B Assets Move to Chainlink Bridge DeFi protocol Lombard has announced its participation in the ongoing LayerZero asset migration, moving approximately $4 billion in assets to Chainlink&rsquo;s cross-chain bridge solution. The move reflects continued capital outflows from the LayerZero ecosystem, while Chainlink&rsquo;s bridging services are gaining favor among institutional-grade projects.
</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="flash-lombard-joins-layerzero-exodus-4b-assets-move-to-chainlink-bridge">[Flash] Lombard Joins LayerZero Exodus, $4B Assets Move to Chainlink Bridge</h2>
<p>DeFi protocol Lombard has announced its participation in the ongoing LayerZero asset migration, moving approximately $4 billion in assets to Chainlink&rsquo;s cross-chain bridge solution. The move reflects continued capital outflows from the LayerZero ecosystem, while Chainlink&rsquo;s bridging services are gaining favor among institutional-grade projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category domain="category">crypto</category>
      <category domain="tag">Chainlink</category><category domain="tag">LayerZero</category><category domain="tag">Bridge</category><category domain="tag">DeFi</category>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>LayerZero Admits Mistake in $292M KelpDAO Exploit</title>
      <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/layerzero-292m-kelp-exploit-admits-mistake-2026-05-09/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 22:49:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>goodinfo.net</author>
      <guid>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/layerzero-292m-kelp-exploit-admits-mistake-2026-05-09/</guid>
      <description>Cross-chain interoperability protocol LayerZero acknowledges primary responsibility for a $292M exploit affecting KelpDAO, reversing its initial framing of the incident as a developer configuration failure.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="the-exploit">The Exploit</h2>
<p>Cross-chain interoperability protocol LayerZero has formally acknowledged that it made a critical error in its architectural decisions related to a $292 million exploit affecting KelpDAO. The admission marks a significant shift from the team&rsquo;s initial characterization of the incident as a &ldquo;developer configuration failure.&rdquo;</p>
<p>LayerZero stated it &ldquo;owns the decision&rdquo; to allow its own verifier to secure high-value assets, rather than employing a more distributed verification mechanism. This design choice created a single point of failure that attackers exploited to drain approximately $292 million in assets.</p>
<h2 id="impact">Impact</h2>
<p>The loss makes this one of the largest DeFi security incidents of 2026. KelpDAO is a major Restaking protocol whose security directly impacts trust across the broader EigenLayer ecosystem. The exploit has reignited concerns about the systemic vulnerabilities inherent in cross-chain bridge and interoperability protocols.</p>
<p>This is not LayerZero&rsquo;s first security incident, raising questions within the community about whether fundamental architectural changes are needed rather than incremental patches.</p>
<h2 id="aftermath">Aftermath</h2>
<p>LayerZero has committed to reevaluating its verifier architecture and strengthening security collaboration with ecosystem partners. The incident has prompted renewed calls for industry-wide security standards for cross-chain protocols.</p>
<p><em>Source: CoinDesk</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category domain="category">crypto</category>
      <category domain="tag">LayerZero</category><category domain="tag">KelpDAO</category><category domain="tag">Cross-chain</category><category domain="tag">DeFi Security</category><category domain="tag">Hack</category>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>[Brief] Solv Protocol Switches to Chainlink for $700M Tokenized Bitcoin</title>
      <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/solv-protocol-chainlink-tokenized-bitcoin/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 14:03:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>goodinfo.net</author>
      <guid>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/solv-protocol-chainlink-tokenized-bitcoin/</guid>
      <description>[Brief] Solv Protocol Switches to Chainlink for $700M Tokenized Bitcoin Solv Protocol is migrating from LayerZero to Chainlink infrastructure to secure $700 million in tokenized Bitcoin holdings, marking one of the most significant DeFi infrastructure switches recently.
</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="brief-solv-protocol-switches-to-chainlink-for-700m-tokenized-bitcoin">[Brief] Solv Protocol Switches to Chainlink for $700M Tokenized Bitcoin</h2>
<p>Solv Protocol is migrating from LayerZero to Chainlink infrastructure to secure $700 million in tokenized Bitcoin holdings, marking one of the most significant DeFi infrastructure switches recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category domain="category">crypto</category>
      <category domain="tag">Solv Protocol</category><category domain="tag">Chainlink</category><category domain="tag">LayerZero</category><category domain="tag">Tokenized Bitcoin</category>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Kelp DAO Ditches LayerZero for Chainlink After $292M Bridge Exploit</title>
      <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/kelp-dao-ditches-layerzero-chainlink-cross-chain-may-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 07:18:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>goodinfo.net</author>
      <guid>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/kelp-dao-ditches-layerzero-chainlink-cross-chain-may-2026/</guid>
      <description>Kelp DAO has migrated from LayerZero to Chainlink&rsquo;s cross-chain infrastructure following a $292 million bridge exploit and a blame dispute between the two protocols.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="kelp-dao-ditches-layerzero-for-chainlink-cross-chain-infrastructure-after-292m-exploit">Kelp DAO Ditches LayerZero for Chainlink Cross-Chain Infrastructure After $292M Exploit</h2>
<p>Kelp DAO has announced it is abandoning the LayerZero cross-chain protocol in favor of Chainlink&rsquo;s cross-chain infrastructure, The Block reports.</p>
<p>This follows a $292 million exploit of a bridge associated with LayerZero. LayerZero previously blamed the breach on Kelp&rsquo;s configuration setup, but Kelp countered that the configuration had been approved by LayerZero itself. The migration marks a broader reassessment of cross-chain security in the DeFi sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category domain="category">crypto</category>
      <category domain="tag">Kelp DAO</category><category domain="tag">LayerZero</category><category domain="tag">Chainlink</category><category domain="tag">cross-chain</category><category domain="tag">DeFi</category>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Kelp Claims LayerZero Approved Setup Blamed for $292M Drift Bridge Hack</title>
      <link>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/kelp-layerzero-drift-bridge-hack-blame-may-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:03:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>goodinfo.net</author>
      <guid>https://goodinfo.net/en/posts/crypto/kelp-layerzero-drift-bridge-hack-blame-may-2026/</guid>
      <description>Kelp DAO claims LayerZero approved the bridge configuration exploited in the $292M Drift hack, shifting blame in the ongoing dispute.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="kelp-points-finger-at-layerzero-in-drift-hack-dispute">Kelp Points Finger at LayerZero in Drift Hack Dispute</h2>
<p>Kelp DAO claims that LayerZero approved the specific bridge configuration that was exploited in the $292 million Drift protocol hack. The DPRK-linked attack remains one of the largest crypto security incidents of 2026.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      
      <category domain="tag">Kelp</category><category domain="tag">LayerZero</category><category domain="tag">Drift</category><category domain="tag">hack</category><category domain="tag">bridge exploit</category>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
